Post reply

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: william
« on: February 13, 2012, 09:05:03 PM »

When using a tet-mesh and second-order scheme the calculated temperatures will be higher or lower than specified temperatures on inlets. This seems to only happen when using tetrahedral mesh, a hex-mesh will not give this problem.

The solution to the problem seems to be to use node-based solution scheme instead of the default cell-based scheme. This was verified with a simple test case as well as with a large (1.8M) cell case and in both cases this helped. Other suggestions I have collected are:

1) W-cycle for energy equation in the Multi-grid options usually gives
good convergence in conduction dominated simulations.

2) In many cases, the solution may not be converged if with a energy URF
less than 0.95. It is advisable to converge the case finally with 0.98
or more.

3) When the mesh has tetrahedral elements and temperature gets limited
(eithermaximum or minimum), we can try switching the secondary-gradient
calculations off using (rpsetvar 'temperature/secondary-gradient? #f).
Note that this is only to give a stable solution in the beginning and to
get the final solution, we need to switch that on eventually.
Posted by: pitney1
« on: February 13, 2012, 09:03:12 PM »

Hi,

I am running a simulation with energy equation activated. The temperature at the outlet is lower than the specified temperature at the inlet. I have tetrahedral mesh.

Please help.

Thanks.